Nine out of ten.
That’s a lot.
Nine out of ten churches in America have an average worship attendance of less than 350. And that percentage has not changed significantly for many years. Yet the unchurched pool of persons is increasing in most communities. There are people yet to be reached.
But most churches will never exceed 350 in attendance. Why?
A Few Caveats
Allow me to preface my analysis. First, big is not necessarily better. A church with more people in attendance is not necessarily more faithful than a smaller church. Second, some churches are in very sparsely populated areas. There may not be 350 people in a five-mile radius (though every community still has people who need to be reached).
My third caveat is key. I believe leadership is indeed a biblical and theological issue. It’s really a matter of healthy stewardship. I offer this third caveat because I will be addressing the issue of leadership in this post.
Attendance Levels of Churches in America
We are a nation and continent of smaller churches. And though we have far more small churches than large churches, there is a big migration of people from smaller to larger churches. In other words, many of the smaller churches are getting smaller, and many of the larger churches are getting larger.
Here is a simple depiction of the number of churches at three different levels:
- 50% of all churches in America average less than 100 in worship attendance.
- 40% of all churches in America average between 100 and 350 in attendance.
- 10% of all churches in America average more than 350 in attendance.
Keep in mind that the upper 10% tend to include more of the growing churches, while the lower 90% tend to include more of the declining churches.
One of the Key Reasons
There is no single reason to explain the apparent ceiling of 350 in attendance of most churches. I do believe, however, that there is a major reason for this barrier. Such is the thesis of this post:
One of the key reasons most churches do not move beyond 350 in average worship attendance is they do not have sufficient leadership and structures in place.
Many smart people have provided analyses of what is commonly known as the 200 barrier. I believe that the 200 barrier is highly elastic. In other words, the barrier is really somewhere between 150 and 350, depending on a number of circumstances. Again, I believe that the key reason stated above is among the greatest inhibitors of growth.
Increasing Organizational Complexity
Moses was an unintended victim of organizational complexity. He was trying the Lone Ranger approach to the leadership of Israel. The nation would implode and he would lose his leadership authority if he kept doing what he was doing.
His father-in-law, Jethro, saw the flaws of his leadership and said:
“What you’re doing is not good . . . You will certainly wear out both yourself and these people who are with you, because the task is too heavy for you. You can’t do it alone” (Exodus 18:17-18, HCSB).
So, following Jethro’s advice and wisdom, Moses became a different kind of leader with a different kind of organization.
Here are the five major levels of organizational complexity in churches according to average worship attendance:
- Under 100: Family and friends
- 100 to 250: Basic
- 251 to 350: Challenging
- 351 to 750: Complex
- Above 750: Highly complex
Most churches cannot or are not willing to make the types of changes that are necessary in complex organizations. In future resources, I will share what many leaders and churches are doing to move beyond the 100, 250, and 350 ceilings. In the meantime, let me hear from you.
Posted on March 25, 2015
With nearly 40 years of ministry experience, Thom Rainer has spent a lifetime committed to the growth and health of local churches across North America.
More from Thom
There is no need to chase High Attendance Figures. Jesus said where only two or three gather He is with them.
The reality is God’s Kingdom has a few Hundred Million Members and we meet in tens of millions of different scattered groups at various times and locales about the Globe.
Chasing a single gathering to have large numbers often is due to Lust for Power and Money. That is the polar opposite of how we are to behave. You want to get things right? Then share with the Needy in Christ and 99% of them are abroad.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_Xf9ldeP98& – Kasih Agape Orphanage – Surabaya
An observation I’ve made over the years echoes one of the comments I read, and that is the more paid staff a church of a given size has, the fewer volunteers there are stepping up. I believe a great deal of that is related to two things. 1) how the Word is presented. and 2) whether the pastor(s) exhibit volunteerism themselves. Why is it that many Pastors count their evening time as “work” hours (i.e. working 4-5 hours on a Wed. since they will be running Wed night Club), when the layperson has worked 8-10 hours and is then coming to volunteer and serve? Which brings us back to #1. The heart of the Pastor can be seen by his love for the Word, and his love for his flock.
wow, I am reading your article 3 years after post. Really feeling outdated…
I think that church growth is divine (not that we are not responsible for it). But the main thrust is God’s love and mercy (using these terms loosely here).
The one trap I see is that the smaller churches are trying to imitate bigger churches methodically and hope to land as a bigger sized church. Just hope that we only stay on course to imitate Christ and let the church size be as it is divinely predestined. just two cents – bw
ever heard of Dunbar’s number? you might find it illuminating.